Hillary Clinton, Wagging Her Tongue

April 19, 2007

It appears that yesterdays 5 to 4 decision upholding the ban on Partial Birth Abortions has Mrs. B.J. Clinton fit to be tied.

In an email sent out from her campaign today, she expresses her displeasure with a legal ruling by the High Court. The email says, “The Court took a dramatic departure from decades of rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Let's be clear: this allows the government to dictate to women what they can and cannot do about their own health.”

This is total BS! Any thinking person knows that abortions are less about ‘health’ and mostly about getting rid of an ‘inconvenience’ of having a baby. Cases of Health concerns, rape, incest and the like account for no more than one per cent of all abortions performed today.

Further proof that she is just plain wrong is found in the ban that the Roberts Court upheld. It states, “This subsection does not apply to a partial-birth abortion that is necessary to save the life of a mother whose life is endangered by a physical disorder, physical illness, or physical injury, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.”

Hillary continues by quoting Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, the most liberal Justice on the Court and a former ACLU attorney (appointed by the Clintons), "This cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this court -- and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives."

Sorry, but as I recall, our “rights” are spelled out in the constitution, not legislated from the bench. The Supreme Court’s responsibility is spelled out in Article III, section 2 of our constitution, “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.”

Nowhere in our constitution is abortion listed as a “right” nor has any state or even the Federal Legislature passed any laws granting that right. It was legislated from a very liberal Supreme Court decision in 1973.

Mrs. B.J. continues, “When the Senate debated the nominations of Samuel Alito and John Roberts to the Supreme Court, I spoke out on the Senate floor about the danger they posed to our constitutional liberties, including the right to choose.”

As shown, the “right to choose” was never a legislated ‘right.’

Seeing a liberal complain about ‘dangers to constitutional liberties’ is most amusing. Many of our constitutionally mandated liberties have already disappeared under the guidance of liberals and more are under threat to disappear, especially our right to ‘free speech’ and second amendment right to ‘bear arms.’

Mrs. B.J. goes on, “We need a president who understands that the best way to protect women's health and reduce the number of abortions is to expand access to family planning -- not to threaten doctors and patients. We need a Congress that will say no to rolling back the rights of women.”

No, we need leaders that see that unbridled lust coupled with the “new morality,” actually just the old immorality, is what encourages unwanted pregnancy. Yes, women have just as much right to enjoy it as do men, but it is the women who ends up pregnant. Sorry, that’s just nature. Not even the liberal Justice Ginsberg can change that.

If you really want to reduce the number of abortions, allow parents to teach decency and morals at home and stop interfering by giving the children free access to condoms while teaching them that their parents are just old ‘fuddy duddy’s’ who don’t understand. We need to allow parents to teach their boys that women are not just sex objects there for their pleasure to use and walk away from.

We need to teach them that while sex is very pleasurable, it does carry a severe consequence, if you aren’t ready. A warm wonderful child if you are ready.

We don’t need government tax dollars given away to pro-abortion groups encouraging unchecked abortions without counseling girls of psychological dangers in the future of wrong decisions when older.

But, above all, we need a Congress that will see that protecting our unborn children is an important step to eliminating the Democrat party’s “culture of death.”

Mrs. B.J. closes with the promise, “As a senator, I will do everything I can to make sure women can protect their health, and when I am president, I will treat the health and well being of women and our constitutional rights once again as true American values.”

If she were serious, she would apply equal importance to our Second Amendment rights, as clearly written and explained in our constitution and even upheld by the Supreme Court.

If she really wants to ‘uphold constitutional rights,’ then overturn Roe vs Wade and allow the individual states, through their citizens, the right to determine for themselves. After all, if a state outlaws abortions, what stops a woman desiring to slaughter her unborn to simply visit a state that allows it?

The hilarious aspect that exposes Hillary and pro-abortionists is found in the opening sentence of the Roe vs Wade decision, “A pregnant single woman (Roe) brought a class action challenging the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe procuring or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother's life.”

In other words, “treat[ing] the health and well being of women and our constitutional rights once again as true American values,” by health concerns, as she keeps alluding to, WAS ALREADY LEGAL!!!!!!! Roe vs Wade wasn’t about a woman’s health, it was about legalizing the slaughter of unborn children.

To you girls, keep your legs closed. To you boys, keep your zippers pulled up. To the adults, if you’re gonna dance, don’t be surprised you have to pay the piper.

Lew

UPDATE: The complete text of her email:

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:18:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Hillary Rodham Clinton" {info@hillaryclinton.com}
To: lewwaters@I’llnevertell.com
Subject: Consequences of yesterday's decision

Dear Lew,

We already knew how important this election was for every American. Yesterday, the Supreme Court raised the stakes even higher.

The Court took a dramatic departure from decades of rulings that upheld a woman's right to choose and recognized the importance of women's health. Let's be clear: this allows the government to dictate to women what they can and cannot do about their own health.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg disagreed with this decision and warned, "This cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away at a right declared again and again by this court -- and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives."

When the Senate debated the nominations of Samuel Alito and John Roberts to the Supreme Court, I spoke out on the Senate floor about the danger they posed to our constitutional liberties, including the right to choose. I urged my colleagues to reject them, and I voted against both of them. Yesterday, unfortunately, we saw the consequences of failing to stop their confirmations.

The decade of work that the far right has done to chip away at our rights was paid off in this Supreme Court decision. They worked hard to gain the presidency and the Senate so they could shape a Supreme Court that rewarded them by putting a narrow ideology above our constitutional rights. In their ruling, the conservative majority even used right-wing code language, referring to obstetricians as "abortion doctors."

There's one way we can respond: redouble our efforts to win the White House and more seats in the House and Senate. We need a president who understands that the best way to protect women's health and reduce the number of abortions is to expand access to family planning -- not to threaten doctors and patients. We need a Congress that will say no to rolling back the rights of women.

And here is my promise to you: As a senator, I will do everything I can to make sure women can protect their health, and when I am president, I will treat the health and well being of women and our constitutional rights once again as true American values.

I hope you'll pass this message along to your friends and talk with them about why this issue is important to you. I'll follow up with you soon with ways you can take direct action to protect our right to choose.

Sincerely,

Hillary Rodham Clinton